Questions of faith - reflections on your own taste, thoughts about right or wrong!

The problem with AUDIO, in my opinion, is that the methods of visual measurement and auditory measurement do not correspond, do not speak the same language. This is due to the fact that they have completely different levels of complexity already.
Also, the ideas of "scientificity" and the art of engineering are fundamentally not developed: if, for example, a method does not measure what it is supposed to measure, e.g. AUDIO, in a complexity appropriate to human hearing, then it is not scientific and does not correspond to the art of engineering. Then we have practically no methods that differentiate and categorize, that lead to any kind of statement - in (at least "empirical science") AUDIO;-)
I think it is visible here that the concepts objective and subjective are not adequately developed also;-)

But since most people don't even know that loudspeakers have different image sizes and forms, that most signals in stereo are mono, that the materials and shapes of loudspeakers have a considerable influence on the sound, and don't want to make up for even this lack of experience by "do it yourself audio", it is hopeless to discuss the subject of AUDIO comprehensively and methodically;-)