With Klippel you can change this afterwards to any position you want.
If I am not mistaken, points in between are being interpolated.
I assume with just some kind of average between.
I have to say that this is one of the main key elements of the system.
Because it means you don't have to measure everything again.
Well, where do you draw the practical line with this?
A line array that's almost as tall as a two story house most certainly won't fit.
In fact, I have my strong doubts that this method of measuring will even hold up so well in those cases.
Well this is where comparisons need to come into the picture.
And truly the away from the baffle distance for a consultant is quite different from design to design. So having a horizontal arm long enough to accomodate different loudspeaker enclosures is going to take a little bit of thinking.
Erin Hardison what say you on whether Klippel can have a few mechanical improvements?
Last edited:
That is exactly what I am doing
File naming is currently (radius, angle, height).wav
Awesome!
That wasn't completely clear to me yet
Just an idea, but you could also also add a time stamp maybe?
In that case linking up measurements with coordinates might be a bit easier?
If you make it larger, you probably need to make it stronger. At the moment it is good enough. The torsion of the vertical bar is the biggest problem. I had to change that to 2040 in order to be acceptable.
At the moment it's just a plate with some holes. Could be made out of wood or metal easily.
I think so. But longer arms -> larger moments -> stronger material -> heavier -> larger steppers -> CNC arduino shield current limit too low -> ...
Everything is related and cost increases quickly. I think you can tweak it some more, but at some point you need another approach and/or different parts/solutions.
Last edited:
Timestamp could be added of course. Linking up measurements and coordinates is as easy as this:
But I'll add a naming convention layer so anyone can add their own way. "We can solve any problem by introducing an extra level of indirection" ("…except for the problem of too many levels of indirection,").
Last edited:
In this case I wasn't being silly about what fancy names people want, I am purely talking about keeping track of stuff to begin with
This is not correct if the measurements are expanded in radiation modes, then interpolation is not required since the radiation modes are continuous. No averaging is required especially since averaging creates issues in and of itself. These are no longer issues with modal expansion. That's kind of the whole point.