Dual membrane planar magnetic (both active driven)

I suspect, the mass reduction by alu, CCA wires (related to copper) well masked by mass of necessary membrane coating (glue, for example). Did you ever measure the mass of glue on membrane? At the Magnepans seems dominating part the glue and the Milloxan. Furthermore this layer make better mechanical coupling between wire and undriven foil sections, gives a better high-frequency response (paradoxically). Perhaps the copper can be enough good (against its higher specific mass)?
 
Maybe your driven mass is too heavy for the magnets .Lack of control.
Have you tried to measure thiele small values .Too high Q value.
Underneeth here some measurements of my AMT´s . One with soft film PVDC Saran and one with mylar.
Might be different aluminium thickness too

Bernt Båndsei
 

Attachments

  • soft imp. 10x32x80mm. Kitharo.JPG
    soft imp. 10x32x80mm. Kitharo.JPG
    114 KB · Views: 14
  • soft imp. 7mm kitharo.JPG
    soft imp. 7mm kitharo.JPG
    116.4 KB · Views: 14
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
When running double membranes you also have higher force factor pushing the air. So if you extend the baffle the bass response below 250Hz will increase.
So almost no adding cost you will get a huge bass boost with a wider and higher baffle.
I have tried it on ESL 63, important to NOT make a H frame rather a v shape where the baffle is pointing back wards.